New England Governors’ Infrastructure Initiative
NEPOOL Participants Committee Update
May 2, 2014
Overview
- Report on NEPOOL Sector Meetings
- Update on continuing State Discussions
- Gas Concept Request for Feedback
NEPOOL Sector Meetings
- States met with each NEPOOL Sector over two days – March 31 & April 14
- States appreciated Sector member time in preparing for and attending discussions
- States provided written summary of Sector meetings in memo dated April 29, 2014
- Common Issues/Questions Across Sectors
- Whether supportive or concerned about state action, there was generally consistent agreement that New England has a problem to solve
- Nature of the problem: reliability and economic competitiveness
- Markets vs. other means
- ISO-NE role
Status of State Discussions To Date
No and/or Low Carbon Resources
- Anticipate one-time solicitation for incremental transmission
- All states share in costs of transmission
- EDC participation in seeking & evaluating power proposals critical, in some states statutorily required
- States developing protocols to address EDC Conflicts of Interest
- States that enter power contracts will share power costs
Natural Gas Pipeline
- Anticipate one-time solicitation for incremental capacity
- Will request proposals priced in increments of 200 mmcf/day, to allow the evaluation of the cost of adding sufficient increments of additional capacity to achieve levels of at least 1bcf above 2013 levels.
- Seeking input on, alternatives to concept states set out in April 30, 2014 memo by May 30, 2014
Cost Allocation on Transmission, Pipeline: Still talking, anticipate consensus view in the near-term
Natural Gas Pipeline Development Concept
The six New England states are interested in exploring a concept through which to develop incremental gas pipeline for electric power system reliability as explained in a memorandum dated April 30, 2014. To that end, the states welcome comment –
- On the approach generally, and on characteristics of contracting entity and capacity manager to best serve electric customers and to minimize transaction costs
- On any alternative configurations and structural means to minimize market distortions
- On the utility proposal as set forth in April 22, 2014 letter to NESCOE
- On specific going-forward market adjustments that would eliminate the need for state action to ensure reliability and economic competitiveness through infrastructure investment after the one-time action currently in process
States presently intend to advance a proposal to NEPOOL for discussion in June toward a Participant Committee vote in September. Because time is of the essence, comments to RegionalInfrastructure@nescoe.com as soon as possible appreciated.